(Wednesday, June 29, 2005 -- CropChoice news) --
1. Study: Wind Could Meet Global Energy Needs 
2.Geo-green goals
3. South Dakota school wants to build wind farm
1. Study: Wind Could Meet Global Energy Needs
By Larry  O'Hanlon, Discovery News
 
 
May 24, 2005 -- A new survey  of wind power around the globe has found there's
ample energy for all humanity  blowing around us. 
By gathering together more than 8,000  wind records on every continent,
researchers Christina Archer and Mark Jacobson  of Stanford University in
California have created a set of world wind-power  resource maps that reveal a barely
tapped 72 terawatts of power -- 40 times the  amount of electrical power used by
all countries in the year 2000. 
If just 20 percent of the estimated 72 terawatts of wind power were tapped,
said Archer, it would satisfy all the  world's energy needs. 
 
 A single terawatt is enough power to  light up 10 billion 100-watt light
bulbs.  
And there is undoubtedly a lot more wind  power out there, said Archer. "We
tend to believe our results are kind of  conservative," she said. "Many
continents are actually lacking wind data over  large areas." 
The study, along with maps of the  continents with their high-speed wind
zones, appears in the May issue of the  Journal of Geophysical Research â¤"
Atmospheres. 
The most wind-charged sites are along  the North Sea in Europe, around the
southern tip of South America, the island of  Tasmania, the Great Lakes region
of North America, and the northeastern and  northwestern coasts of North
America. 
The good news is that wind generators  are being built at record rates,
Archer and Jacobson report. 
 
Over the past five years wind power  systems have grown at an annual rate of
34 percent. That makes it the  fastest-growing electrical power source. "We
are kind of reassured that the  numbers they have come up with are at least as
good as those produced in the  past," said Mike Robinson, deputy director of
the National Renewable Energy  Laboratory's Wind Technology Center in Colorado. 
"There's a tremendous amount of  wind."  
What's really needed, said Robinson, is  a whole lot more and better real
data from the ground to the heights of  turbines.
That would allow for a more detailed  understanding of the resource, and help
engineers build better wind turbines. 
 
Wind Power Potential  in Europe
Archer and Jacobson used estimates. 
They made data from different  instruments and different heights stand
shoulder-to-shoulder by recalculating  each wind velocity so that they were all
equivalent to winds at 80 meters, or  300 feet, above the ground everywhere. 
That's the hub-height of modern, giant  wind turbines that are becoming more
common. These taller, slower-moving wind  turbines are more efficient and
create fewer hazards for birds. 
Wind power currently accounts for just a  little more than a half percent of
the world⤙s electrical power. 
  
The shortfall is the result of two  things, says Archer: The lack of wind
data to help people properly place  generators and the misperception that wind is
unreliable. 
 
It's also not easy for utility companies  even in windy places to break the
fossil fuel habit, said Matt Baker, executive  director of Environment
Colorado, speaking to the High Country News  earlier this month.
"It's so hard for people to back off  this obsession with coal and instead
focus on efficiency and new technology,"  said Baker. 
2. Community Columnist: Geo-green goals
Lincoln Journal Star, June 25, 2005
BY JEFF COLE
Amidst our red/blue  political polarization, a new color has
emerged -- geo-green. Unlike the  blue/red's obsessive, almost pathological focus
on marginal social issues that  divide us (could anything be less important to
our nation's future than the  constitutionality of same-sex marriage?), the
geo-green agenda is centered on  the nexus of energy, economics and security
policy --  issues that will largely  determine the United States' standing in the
21st century. 
Geo-greens are an odd grouping -- uniting hawks such as former CIA  Director
James Woolsey, "family values" advocate Gary Bauer, the Sierra Club's  Dan
Becker and energy guru Amory Lovins. Geo-green policies are advocated by  groups
with such rousing patriotic names as Set America Free, which laments the  
extent that the U.S. economy and security are held hostage to foreign energy  
suppliers, and The Apollo Project, a grouping of labor and environmental leaders  
convinced that future prosperity is linked to energy innovation and  efficiency. 
What binds these diverse individuals and groups is a  conviction that our
dependence on foreign oil jeopardizes our future. In a time of growing
international demand, paired with dwindling supplies concentrated in  the hands of a
few autocratic regimes, geo-greens see grave threats for both  U.S. security and
economic health. To address these threats, geo-greens advocate  policies that
stimulate development of alternative, domestically produced energy  resources
and increased efficiency. 
Rather than continuing our love  affair with imported oil to fuel-inefficient
cars, geo-greens would invest in  U.S. know-how to achieve energy
independence within the decade. The Apollo Project, for example, envisions  a 10-year,
$30 billion annual program of government-supported,  private-sector-led
investment to reorient our economy toward domestically  secure, renewable energy
supplies and innovative, energy-efficient  design. 
While the $300 billion price tag  may seem staggering (and  other, less
expensive proposals are being promoted), independent economic  analyses calculate
such an undertaking would stimulate equally staggering  economy-wide returns -- $1.3 trillion in new GDP, 3.3 million new  high-skilled/high-wage jobs and
$285 billion in net energy cost savings. Much like the first moon shot, such an
initiative would provide a shot in the arm to  the U.S. education system,
reinvigorating interest in math and science as  gateways to these new high-paying
energy jobs. 
For those who doubt the  federal government's ability to absorb a $300
billion investment, remember that  is much less than the running tab of our terror
wars. Currently, U.S. consumers'  junkie-like dependence on foreign gas to fill
up inefficient cars sends billions  to governments that indirectly support
the very jihadists who our taxpayers are  paying hundreds of billions to fight
in the oil-rich Middle East. It's crazy. 
Investments in domestically secure renewables and next-generation  
automobiles would, on the other hand, directly enhance both our security and our  
economy. 
Nebraskans could benefit tremendously from a new energy diet  such as the one
envisioned by the geo-greens. In addition to increasing national  demand for
Nebraska-produced ethanol, an energy policy focused on renewables  could
exploit one of our state's most abundant resources: wind power. Excess  electricity
generated by next-generation turbines (designed at UNL) scattered  across
Nebraska's wind-swept plains could be a significant contributor to our  domestic
fuel mix as it boosted incomes in rural communities. 
Bold  political leadership is needed to help direct the United States'
unparalleled  innovative capacity toward such far-reaching goals. Unfortunately,
President  Bush and Congress thus far have paid only lip service to achieving
greater  energy independence. The House-approved energy bill combines the
standard fare  of "old energy" subsidies designed by coal, oil and gas lobbyists in
those  infamous closed-door sessions with Vice President Cheney, with a
continuation of  pathetic fuel economy standards. Instead of aggressive incentives to
promote  energy innovation and to accelerate growing consumer demand for
next-generation  autos, we have yet more giveaways to multinational oil companies
and  continuation of exemptions to fuel economy standards on, and tax breaks
for,  gas-guzzling Hummers and SUVs. It's a pathetic proposal in need of
dramatic  revisions. 
With rising energy prices threatening our prosperity,  dwindling global
petroleum reserves threatening our security and rising global  temperatures
threatening our very existence, it is not surprising that pollsters  have found
broad-based public support for innovative solutions to our energy  problems. 
Not coincidentally, the president's energy rhetoric has  changed. Recently,
Bush has begun advocating a "national strategy" to harness  the
"transformational power of technology" to "grow our economy, protect our  environment, and
achieve greater energy independence." 
One hopes the  Senate, currently debating the energy bill, will take
advantage of the  president's rhetorical opening to craft an alternative bill that
will, like the  visionary solutions advocated by the geo-greens, help achieve
real energy  independence in the short term. A cleaner, more secure, more
prosperous future  awaits all Americans  -- red, blue and geo-green alike. 
Jeff Cole is  going on six years in Lincoln and still feels it is one of the
best places in  America to raise a family. 
3. South Dakota School Wants to Build Wind Farm
Source: Argus Leader
[Jun 17, 2005] 
SYNOPSIS: Faith School Board hopes to build a wind farm that not only covers the cost of a new school building but also pumps revenue into the general fund. FAITH (AP) - Faith school leaders hope new wind-measuring devices will help them move ahead with plans to pay for a new school through profits from a wind farm. 
The state fire marshal ordered the district to abandon its 81-year-old brick and mortar classrooms in June 2004 because of structural problems and safety concerns about fire exits, narrow hallways and dead-end corridors. The district's 200 students have since been studying in temporary classrooms. 
The Faith School Board hopes to build a wind farm that not only covers the cost of a new school building but also pumps revenue into the general fund. School officials were exploring the idea even before the old building was condemned. 
"The school needs to own a business," said Mike Haines, who's been active in planning the Fox Ridge Wind Farm and a renewable energy institute that would be part of the school. 
Public Utilities Commissioner Bob Sahr said community-based projects face a lot of hurdles, but there's much interest across the country in renewable energy sources that can help local economies. 
"Someone is going to do it," Sahr said. "It would be great if it happens in Faith." 
Officials from the Faith School Board and the PUC said the anemometers will provide the first accurate information about winds in the area. 
Sahr said the anemometers would be the first in western South Dakota connected to the South Dakota Wind Resource Assessment Network. 
Grants from the U.S. Department of Energy and Florida Power and Light will help cover the $10,000 cost of the meters and their installation. South Dakota State University will collect daily readings and analyze the data for free.